Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-05-10

CHAIRMAN, R.S.R.T.C. vs SANTOSH .

Citation / case number
SC 2012/259
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHAIRMAN, R.S.R.T.C.
Respondent
SANTOSH .
Author
FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA B.S. CHAUHAN
Bench
FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the status of 'Jugaad' under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, specifically under Section 2(28), determining that it qualifies as a motor vehicle. The Court emphasized that 'Jugaad' must be registered, insured, and operated by a licensed driver, as per the Act's provisions. The Court directed State Governments to enforce compliance with these requirements, highlighting the importance of adhering to the statutory framework for vehicular safety and liability.

CHAIRMAN, R.S.R.T.C. vs SANTOSH . · Niyam