Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-03-15

NIRANJAN HEMCHANDRA SASHITTAL & ANR. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2012/60346
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NIRANJAN HEMCHANDRA SASHITTAL & ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
DIPAK MISRA K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a writ petition under Article 32 concerning the delay in trial and its impact on the petitioners' fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized the right to a speedy trial and noted the emotional and mental stress caused by prolonged proceedings, leading to the quashing of criminal prosecution against two elderly women due to insufficient evidence and the unreasonable burden of a lengthy trial. The Court upheld the dismissal of appeals by the public servant and his wife, reinforcing the importance of timely justice in criminal proceedings.

NIRANJAN HEMCHANDRA SASHITTAL & ANR. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam