Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-03-13

SATYAPAL vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 2007/60155
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SATYAPAL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA A.K. PATNAIK
Bench
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA A.K. PATNAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment which convicted the appellant under Section 304B IPC for dowry death, establishing that the demand for dowry and subsequent harassment were proven through credible witness testimonies. The Court emphasized that the presumption under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act applies when a woman dies under suspicious circumstances within seven years of marriage, and the burden shifts to the accused to disprove the dowry-related harassment. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court.

SATYAPAL vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam