Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-03-21

AHMED SHAH KHAN DURRANI @ A.S. MUBARAK S vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2007/29580
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AHMED SHAH KHAN DURRANI @ A.S. MUBARAK S
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
B.S. CHAUHAN P. SATHASIVAM
Bench
B.S. CHAUHAN P. SATHASIVAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA), affirming the sentence of 5 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 25,000, with an additional 6 months of imprisonment in default of payment. The Court emphasized the gravity of the Bombay Blast incident, which resulted in significant loss of life and property, and reiterated the importance of stringent measures against terrorism. The judgment clarified the applicability of TADA in cases involving conspiracy and terrorist activities, reinforcing the legal framework for prosecuting such offenses.

AHMED SHAH KHAN DURRANI @ A.S. MUBARAK S vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam