Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-03-11

Budh Singh vs State Of Haryana & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2013 SUPREME COURT 2386
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Budh Singh
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Anr
Author
Ranjan Gogoi
Bench
Ranjan Gogoi, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 32A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, ruling that it does not violate Articles 14, 20(1), or 21 of the Constitution. The Court clarified that the provision does not infringe upon the personal liberty of convicts as it does not render the trial process arbitrary or discriminatory. The petitioner’s claim for remissions was rejected, affirming that the law in force at the time of the offence governs the penalties, and thus the sentence of 10 years imprisonment remains intact without the benefit of remission.

Budh Singh vs State Of Haryana & Anr · Niyam