Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-06-25

SANCHARI DEVI vs ARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Citation / case number
SC 2009/15901
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SANCHARI DEVI
Respondent
ARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Author
RANJAN GOGOI A.K. PATNAIK
Bench
RANJAN GOGOI A.K. PATNAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Bihar Municipal Officers and Servants Pension Rules, 1987, apply to all permanent employees of the Municipalities and Notified Area Committees in Bihar, and that the entitlement to pension under these Rules is contingent upon the exercise of an option as specified in Rule 4. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that Ramashish Prasad and Vishwanath Ram were not entitled to pension benefits as they failed to exercise their option within the stipulated time. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling.

SANCHARI DEVI vs ARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION · Niyam