Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-04

S.P. MALHOTRA vs P.N.B. .

Citation / case number
SC 2012/41762
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.P. MALHOTRA
Respondent
P.N.B. .
Author
S.A. BOBDE B.S. CHAUHAN
Bench
S.A. BOBDE B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Regulation 17 of the Punjab National Bank Officers/Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1977, the Disciplinary Authority must provide reasons for disagreeing with the Enquiry Officer's findings and communicate these to the delinquent for a response before imposing punishment. The Court reversed the High Court's decision that had overturned the Single Judge's ruling, thereby reinstating the requirement for procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings. The appeal was allowed, affirming the necessity of adherence to due process in disciplinary actions.

S.P. MALHOTRA vs P.N.B. . · Niyam