Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-12

MEHSANA NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD. vs SHREEJI CAB CO.& ORS.ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2012/16415
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MEHSANA NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD.
Respondent
SHREEJI CAB CO.& ORS.ETC.
Author
MADAN B. LOKUR H.L. GOKHALE
Bench
MADAN B. LOKUR H.L. GOKHALE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that in a summary trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when a second Magistrate succeeds a first who has partly heard the case, the second Magistrate must re-hear the case afresh only if the evidence was recorded in a summary manner. In this case, since the evidence was recorded in full, the High Court's order for a fresh recording of evidence was set aside. The Court directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mehsana, to proceed from the current stage of the trial, rejecting the respondents' application to add another party to the complaint.

MEHSANA NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD. vs SHREEJI CAB CO.& ORS.ETC. · Niyam