Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-03

MAHARSHI MAHESH JOGI V.VISHWAVIDYALAYA vs STATE OF M.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/13045
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHARSHI MAHESH JOGI V.VISHWAVIDYALAYA
Respondent
STATE OF M.P. .
Author
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Bench
FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the amendments made to the Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1995, specifically affirming the validity of amendments to Sections 4(1), 9(2), 31-A(1) and (2), 31-B, 31-C, 37-B(a), 37-B(b), 37-B(d), and 37-B(e) as intra-vires. However, it declared the proviso to Section 4 regarding the establishment of new Centres and the requirement for prior approval for conducting courses as ultra-vires. Additionally, Section 37-A was found to be entirely ultra-vires. The Court's holding reinforced the legislative intent behind the amendments while ensuring compliance with constitutional limits.

MAHARSHI MAHESH JOGI V.VISHWAVIDYALAYA vs STATE OF M.P. . · Niyam