Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-29

Govinda Bala Patil (D) By Lrs vs Ganpati Ramchandra Naikwade (D) By Lrs

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2013 SC 219
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Govinda Bala Patil (D) By Lrs
Respondent
Ganpati Ramchandra Naikwade (D) By Lrs
Author
Chandramauli Kr. Prasad
Bench
Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, V. Gopala Gowda

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal concerning the interpretation of Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, regarding the determination of land price and lease agreements. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, which found that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal had improperly overturned the Sub-Divisional Officer's factual findings that the land was not leased for sugarcane cultivation. The Court clarified that the findings of fact consistent with evidence cannot be dislodged by a revisional authority, thereby affirming the High Court's ruling and the original order of the Sub-Divisional Officer.

Govinda Bala Patil (D) By Lrs vs Ganpati Ramchandra Naikwade (D) By Lrs · Niyam