Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-18

Dharam Pal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2013 SUPREME COURT 3018
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dharam Pal & Ors
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Anr
Author
Altamas Kabir
Bench
Vikramajit Sen, M.Y. Eqbal, Ranjan Gogoi, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court referred the matter to a Constitution Bench to resolve conflicting opinions regarding the powers of the Session Court and Committing Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, specifically Sections 193, 209, and 319. The Three-Judge Bench disagreed with the interpretation in Ranjit Singh's case, which limited the Session Court's ability to add accused persons until a specific stage in the trial. The Constitution Bench will consider whether the Committing Magistrate has a role post-committal and if they can summon additional accused based on their findings from the police report.

Dharam Pal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr · Niyam