Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-05

V.K.Bansal vs State Of Haryana & Ors.Etc.Etc

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V.K.Bansal
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Ors.Etc.Etc
Author
T.S. Thakur
Bench
Gyan Sudha Misra, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the High Court erred in denying the appellant's request for concurrent sentences under Section 427 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in cases involving dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held that the High Court's decision to maintain consecutive sentences was justified, as the sentences were not deemed excessive given the amounts involved. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

V.K.Bansal vs State Of Haryana & Ors.Etc.Etc · Niyam