Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-07-04

S.P. Malhotra vs P.N.B. & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.P. Malhotra
Respondent
P.N.B. & Ors
Bench
S.A. Bobde, B.S. Chauhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Disciplinary Authority must provide reasons for disagreement with the Enquiry Officer's findings and communicate them to the delinquent, allowing for a response before imposing punishment, as mandated by Regulation 17 of the Punjab National Bank Officers/Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1977. The Court found that the High Court's reversal of the Single Judge's decision was incorrect, as the procedural safeguards were not followed, leading to the conclusion that the dismissal was vitiated. The Court reinstated the Single Judge's order, emphasizing the necessity of adherence to due process in disciplinary proceedings.

S.P. Malhotra vs P.N.B. & Ors · Niyam