Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-01-10

ARUN BHANDARI vs STATE OF U.P..

Citation / case number
SC 2011/6722
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARUN BHANDARI
Respondent
STATE OF U.P..
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
DIPAK MISRA K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the legality of the High Court's order quashing the cognizance taken under Sections 406 and 420 IPC by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The Court held that the allegations in the FIR and protest petition did indeed constitute offences under these sections, emphasizing that the essence of cheating and criminal breach of trust was present due to the fraudulent sale of property. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, reinstating the proceedings against the respondents.

ARUN BHANDARI vs STATE OF U.P.. · Niyam