STATE BANK OF INDIA vs NARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the dismissal of the charged officer under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, finding that the State Bank of India failed to provide adequate evidence for the charges against him, which included serious allegations of misconduct and fraud. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the principles of natural justice and the requirement for a fair inquiry as mandated by the Service Rules. The judgment reinforced the importance of proper procedural compliance in disciplinary actions against employees.