Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-01-08

SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE(DELHI ADMINISTRATION)

Citation / case number
SC 2011/22328
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUBHASH CHAND
Respondent
STATE(DELHI ADMINISTRATION)
Author
RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
Bench
RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI AFTAB ALAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a complaint case under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 must be filed in the High Court as per Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, rather than in the Sessions Court under Section 378(1). The Court held that the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain such appeals, thereby upholding the High Court's earlier decision to transfer the appeal from the Sessions Court. The appeal was allowed, affirming the High Court's jurisdictional ruling.

SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE(DELHI ADMINISTRATION) · Niyam