Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-01-09

A.SRIMANNARAYANA vs DASARI SANTAKUMARI

Citation / case number
SC 2010/26923
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.SRIMANNARAYANA
Respondent
DASARI SANTAKUMARI
Author
ANIL R. DAVE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the revision petition by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, affirming that the earlier judgment in Martin F. D'Souza Vs. Mohd. Ishfaq (2009) 3 SCC 1 is per incuriam, as clarified in V. Kishan Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital & Anr. (2010) 5 SCC 513. The Court emphasized that the requirement for expert opinion in consumer complaints is not absolute and can be determined by the facts of each case. The appeals were dismissed, maintaining the National Commission's order.

A.SRIMANNARAYANA vs DASARI SANTAKUMARI · Niyam