Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-01-21

DEEPAK AGGARWAL vs KESHAV KAUSHIK .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/18908
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DEEPAK AGGARWAL
Respondent
KESHAV KAUSHIK .
Author
R.M. LODHA,ANIL R. DAVE,RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
R.M. LODHA,ANIL R. DAVE,RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'the service' and 'advocate' under Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India, determining that full-time government employees like District Attorneys are eligible for appointment as District Judges. The Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision to quash certain appointments while allowing the appointment of candidates from the merit list. The judgment clarified the eligibility criteria for judicial appointments, emphasizing adherence to statutory rules and the need for merit-based selection.

DEEPAK AGGARWAL vs KESHAV KAUSHIK . · Niyam