Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-01-14

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S. Australian Foods India Private Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2013 SUPREME COURT 1057
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Respondent
M/S. Australian Foods India Private Ltd
Author
D.K. Jain
Bench
D.K. Jain, Jagdish Singh Khehar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether the manufacture and sale of goods without a physical brand name disqualifies an assessee from the benefits of S.S.I. Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The Court held that the absence of a brand name on the goods themselves, despite being sold from branded outlets, does not negate eligibility for small scale exemption under the notification. The Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision that the assessee was entitled to the exemption as the goods sold loosely did not bear a brand name, thus upholding the lower authority's findings.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S. Australian Foods India Private Ltd · Niyam