Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-02-13

SURESH KUMAR BHIKAMCHAND JAIN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2013/90286
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SURESH KUMAR BHIKAMCHAND JAIN
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,J. CHELAMESWAR,VIKRAMAJIT SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of an accused's right to bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, holding that once the statutory period of 90 days has lapsed without taking cognizance due to lack of sanction, the accused cannot be remanded to custody. The Court emphasized that remand orders cannot continue indefinitely without cognizance being taken, as mandated by Section 309 Cr.P.C. The Court ultimately directed the Special Judge to expedite the hearing on framing charges against the petitioner.

SURESH KUMAR BHIKAMCHAND JAIN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. · Niyam