Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-02-20

Sunil Mehta & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2013 SC 381
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sunil Mehta & Anr
Respondent
State Of Gujarat & Anr
Author
T.S. Thakur
Bench
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that depositions of the complainant and witnesses recorded under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 can be considered as evidence for framing charges under Section 244. The Court emphasized that the accused had the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses but failed to do so, thus validating the Magistrate's decision to frame charges under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The High Court's order allowing the complaint was upheld, reinforcing the procedural compliance under the Cr.P.C.

Sunil Mehta & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Anr · Niyam