Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-02-04

M. Manohar Reddy & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2013 SUPREME COURT 795
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. Manohar Reddy & Anr
Respondent
Union Of India & Ors
Author
Aftab Alam
Bench
Ranjana Prakash Desai, Aftab Alam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the appointment of a judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on grounds of a pending criminal trial and concealment of facts during enrolment as an advocate. The Court emphasized that the consultation process for judicial appointments must consider the integrity and background of candidates, particularly in light of ongoing criminal proceedings. The petition was dismissed, affirming the validity of the appointment and the necessity of thorough vetting in judicial selections.

M. Manohar Reddy & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors · Niyam