Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-02-13

Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Author
Altamas Kabir
Bench
Vikramajit Sen, J. Chelameswar, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of bail rights under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, holding that once the statutory period of 90 days has lapsed without cognizance being taken due to lack of sanction, the accused cannot be remanded to custody. The Court emphasized that remand orders made beyond this period are invalid and the accused is entitled to be released on bail. The judgment clarifies the limitations on the Magistrate's power to remand under the Cr.P.C. and the implications of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam