Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-08-22

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS. vs RAJU THR.MEMBER JUVENILE JUSTICE BRD&ANR

Citation / case number
SC 2013/90289
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS.
Respondent
RAJU THR.MEMBER JUVENILE JUSTICE BRD&ANR
Author
RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
P SATHASIVAM,RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI,RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that third parties do not have the right to intervene in criminal prosecutions, which are primarily the State's responsibility, as established under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The Court held that the petitioners' request to interpret the Act to allow prosecution of juveniles in regular courts was not permissible, affirming the High Court's dismissal of their public interest litigation. The Court emphasized the need to respect the legislative framework governing juvenile offenders, particularly in heinous crimes, while also recognizing the rights of victims under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS. vs RAJU THR.MEMBER JUVENILE JUSTICE BRD&ANR · Niyam