Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-08-27

NAGPUR CERAMIC P.LTD.TR.M.D. vs CHANDRIKA ETC.ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2012/2524
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NAGPUR CERAMIC P.LTD.TR.M.D.
Respondent
CHANDRIKA ETC.ETC.
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA H.L. DATTU
Bench
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA H.L. DATTU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellate court erred in admitting the company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, as the appellant's defense was not a 'moonshine defense' and demonstrated the capacity to pay its debts. The Court set aside the appellate court's order and allowed the appellant to contest the claims, reserving the respondents' right to file a civil suit for recovery if not barred by limitation. The judgment emphasizes the importance of a legitimate defense in company petitions under the Act.

NAGPUR CERAMIC P.LTD.TR.M.D. vs CHANDRIKA ETC.ETC. · Niyam