Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-08-27

Nagpur Ceramic P.Ltd.Tr.M.D vs Chandrika Etc.Etc

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nagpur Ceramic P.Ltd.Tr.M.D
Respondent
Chandrika Etc.Etc
Bench
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, H.L. Dattu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellate Court erred in admitting the Company Petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, as the appellant-company's defense was not a moonshine defense and demonstrated its capacity to pay the debts. The Court set aside the appellate Court's order, allowing the appellant-company's appeal and reserving liberty for the respondents to file a civil suit for recovery if not barred by limitation. The judgment emphasizes the importance of a bona fide defense in company petitions under the Act.

Nagpur Ceramic P.Ltd.Tr.M.D vs Chandrika Etc.Etc · Niyam