Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-04-26

N NARAYANAN vs ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI

Citation / case number
SC 2013/201
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N NARAYANAN
Respondent
ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI
Author
K. S. Radhakrishnan
Bench
DIPAK MISRA K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal and SEBI, confirming the imposition of a two-year restriction on the appellant from dealing in securities and a monetary penalty of 50 lakhs under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act. The Court found that the appellant, as a promoter and director of Pyramid Saimira Theatre Limited, was involved in serious irregularities, including inflated financial statements that misled investors, violating Section 12A of the SEBI Act and multiple provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practice Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003. The Court emphasized the importance of investor protection and market integrity in its ruling.

N NARAYANAN vs ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI · Niyam