Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-04-11

RAM PAL @ BUNDA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 2011/40105
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM PAL @ BUNDA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Author
FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA B.S. CHAUHAN
Bench
FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 376 IPC for the murder and rape of Devi, emphasizing the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence. The Court noted key circumstances including the appellant's presence at the crime scene, his flight from the village post-offence, and a motive rooted in past grievances. The Court affirmed the trial court's findings and maintained the life sentence and additional imprisonment for the appellant, reinforcing the legal principle that circumstantial evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt when linked coherently.

RAM PAL @ BUNDA vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam