Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-04-17

RAM BHAROSEY LAL GUPTA(D) BY LR. vs M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP.LD.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/28507
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM BHAROSEY LAL GUPTA(D) BY LR.
Respondent
M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP.LD.
Author
V. Gopala Gowda
Bench
V. GOPALA GOWDA CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 106 and 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act, a landlord can terminate a lease by issuing a notice to the tenant, and if the tenant fails to respond or vacate, the landlord is entitled to file for eviction. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision to grant eviction in favor of the appellants, as the respondents did not comply with the notice to vacate. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, restoring the decree of eviction and possession in favor of the appellants.

RAM BHAROSEY LAL GUPTA(D) BY LR. vs M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP.LD. · Niyam