Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-04-26

Rajasthan State Road Tpt. Corp. & Ors vs Madu Giri(Dead) By Lrs. & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2013 SC 328
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajasthan State Road Tpt. Corp. & Ors
Respondent
Madu Giri(Dead) By Lrs. & Anr
Author
M.Y. Eqbal
Bench
M.Y. Eqbal, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that employees of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation are not eligible for pensionary benefits under the Pension Scheme due to their failure to comply with the essential conditions of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Employees Pension Regulations, 1989, specifically Clause 3(1), which mandates the deposit of the employer’s share of the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) with interest within a stipulated time. The Court held that the High Court's direction to accept the employees' option for pension was inconsistent with the Regulations, leading to the dismissal of the appeals by the Corporation.

Rajasthan State Road Tpt. Corp. & Ors vs Madu Giri(Dead) By Lrs. & Anr · Niyam