NAMIT SHARMA vs UNION OF INDIA

The Supreme Court held that the Right to Information Act, 2005 is essential for ensuring transparency and accountability in governance, as it stems from the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that the criteria for appointing adjudicators under the Act must be clear and constitutional, rejecting vague and general standards that undermine the Act's purpose. The judgment reinforces the principle that informed citizenry is vital for democracy, and the Court directed the government to ensure proper implementation of the Act.