Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-09-11

State Of U.P.& Anr vs Ram Ashrey & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2012 SC 353
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P.& Anr
Respondent
Ram Ashrey & Anr
Author
H.L. Gokhale
Bench
H.L. Gokhale

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the FIR registered under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Court held that the delay in lodging the FIR and the procedural lapses by the police did not invalidate the FIR, emphasizing that the essence of justice must prevail over technicalities. The Court ultimately upheld the registration of the FIR and the ongoing proceedings, reinforcing the importance of timely action in cases involving allegations of atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Tribes.

State Of U.P.& Anr vs Ram Ashrey & Anr · Niyam