Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-09-10

Vilas Pandurang Pawar & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC( CRI) 1630
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vilas Pandurang Pawar & Anr
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
P. Sathasivam, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not applicable to offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, as per Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. The Court emphasized that the specific allegations of caste-based abuse and assault in the complaint warranted the application of the SC/ST Act, thus denying the petitioners' request for anticipatory bail. The Court upheld the lower courts' decisions rejecting the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners.

Vilas Pandurang Pawar & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam