Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-09-27

Abdul Rehman & Anr vs Mohd.Ruldu & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Abdul Rehman & Anr
Respondent
Mohd.Ruldu & Ors
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
P. Sathasivam, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' revision against the Civil Judge's order denying their application for amendment of the plaint in a land dispute case. The Court emphasized that under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, amendments should be allowed if they do not change the nature of the suit and are necessary for determining the real issues. The Court found that the proposed amendments were not necessary for the adjudication of the case, thus affirming the lower court's decision.

Abdul Rehman & Anr vs Mohd.Ruldu & Ors · Niyam