Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-09-25

Pricewaterhousecoopers Pvt.Ltd vs C.I.T-Kolkata-I & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pricewaterhousecoopers Pvt.Ltd
Respondent
C.I.T-Kolkata-I & Anr
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
Madan B. Lokur, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was unjustified as the assessee's claim for deduction of gratuity provision was inadvertent and overlooked by the Assessing Officer. The Court emphasized that the assessee had complied with statutory requirements under Sections 139(6) and 44AB, and the reopening of assessment under Section 148 was not warranted. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, although the quantum was reduced by the High Court.

Pricewaterhousecoopers Pvt.Ltd vs C.I.T-Kolkata-I & Anr · Niyam