Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-10-11

SURINDER SINGH BRAR & ORS. ETC.ETC. vs SURINDER SINGH BRAR . ETC.ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2011/13643
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SURINDER SINGH BRAR & ORS. ETC.ETC.
Respondent
SURINDER SINGH BRAR . ETC.ETC.
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA G.S. SINGHVI
Bench
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA G.S. SINGHVI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of land acquisition for the development of Chandigarh, emphasizing the adherence to the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The Court held that the notifications issued under Section 4 and Section 20 of the Indian Forest Act were valid, thereby affirming the designation of the land as reserved forest. The outcome reinforced the government's authority to acquire land for public purposes while ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.

SURINDER SINGH BRAR & ORS. ETC.ETC. vs SURINDER SINGH BRAR . ETC.ETC. · Niyam