Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-11-29

HRIDYANAND SHUKLA vs YADUPATI CHAUHAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/26809
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HRIDYANAND SHUKLA
Respondent
YADUPATI CHAUHAN .
Author
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD H.L. DATTU
Bench
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD H.L. DATTU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused A-1 and A-2 under Sections 396 and 397 of the IPC, finding insufficient evidence as they were not named in the FIR and lacked early identification by witnesses. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to maintain the conviction of A-3, A-4, and A-5 under Section 412 IPC, rejecting the complainant's appeal for re-evaluation of evidence. The ruling emphasizes the necessity of credible evidence for conviction in serious offenses under the IPC.

HRIDYANAND SHUKLA vs YADUPATI CHAUHAN . · Niyam