Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-11-29

HEM RAJ vs KARTAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/14875
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HEM RAJ
Respondent
KARTAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. .
Author
ANIL R. DAVE R.M. LODHA
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE R.M. LODHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the compensation awarded under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, affirming the reference court's enhancement of compensation to Rs. 22 per square yard along with a 15% solatium and 6% interest from the date of dispossession. The Court dismissed the State of Haryana's appeal, reiterating that the amendments made by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984, do not affect the rights of the respondents as the proceedings were already concluded. The judgment emphasized the finality of the earlier decisions and the necessity of adhering to the established compensation framework under the Act.

HEM RAJ vs KARTAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. . · Niyam