Venkatesh R vs Divisional Manager, Ksrtc

The Supreme Court found that the High Court erred in its judgment by incorrectly assuming that the appellant had lost vision in his left eye, when in fact he had only suffered a leg fracture. The Court held that the High Court's decision was based on a misdirection of facts, warranting a remand for fresh consideration of the case in accordance with law. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside without costs.