Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-11-09

Satbir Singh vs Chief Of The Army Staff,New Delhi&Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satbir Singh
Respondent
Chief Of The Army Staff,New Delhi&Anr
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
P. Sathasivam, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to deny the appellant salary and terminal benefits for the intervening period after his discharge from service was unjustified. The Court emphasized that since the High Court found the discharge to be unsustainable, the appellant should be entitled to have the intervening period counted for terminal benefits. The Court directed that the appellant's intervening period of service must be considered for calculating terminal benefits, thereby overturning the High Court's ruling on this aspect.

Satbir Singh vs Chief Of The Army Staff,New Delhi&Anr · Niyam