Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-05-10

MRUDUL M DAMLE & ANR vs C.B.I.,NEW DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2012/60330
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MRUDUL M DAMLE & ANR
Respondent
C.B.I.,NEW DELHI
Author
T.S. THAKUR
Bench
GYAN SUDHA MISRA T.S. THAKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a transfer petition under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, held that the convenience of the accused and witnesses is a valid ground for transferring a case. The Court noted that the majority of witnesses were from Maharashtra, and the trial's progress in Delhi was slow, causing undue hardship to the petitioners. Consequently, the Court ordered the transfer of Criminal Case No. 45 of 2008 from the Court of Special Judge, CBI Cases, Rohini, New Delhi to the Court of Special Judge, CBI Cases, Thane, Maharashtra.

MRUDUL M DAMLE & ANR vs C.B.I.,NEW DELHI · Niyam