Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-05-25

Mukut Bihari & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 2270
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mukut Bihari & Anr
Respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Author
B.S. Chauhan
Bench
Dipak Misra, B.S. Chauhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and Section 120B IPC, affirming the High Court's decision. The Court clarified that the mere acceptance of bribe constitutes sufficient evidence for conviction, rejecting the argument that independent eyewitness testimony is mandatory. The Court found that the prosecution had established the demand for illegal gratification and the subsequent acceptance of the bribe, thus maintaining the sentences of rigorous imprisonment for two years for each appellant.

Mukut Bihari & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan · Niyam