Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-03-01

STATE OF U.P. vs DURGA PRASAD

Citation / case number
SC 2001/10938
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
DURGA PRASAD
Author
ANIL R. DAVE H.L. DATTU
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE H.L. DATTU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to acquit the respondents-accused under Sections 302, 147, 148, and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, affirming that the High Court's re-evaluation of evidence did not reveal any legal error warranting interference. The Court emphasized its limited scope of review under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, confirming the High Court's judgment as justifiable. Consequently, the appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh was rejected.

STATE OF U.P. vs DURGA PRASAD · Niyam