Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-07-05

COX & KINGS LTD. vs INDIAN RLY.CATERING & TOURSM.COR.LD.&ANR

Citation / case number
SC 2012/1212
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COX & KINGS LTD.
Respondent
INDIAN RLY.CATERING & TOURSM.COR.LD.&ANR
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR
Bench
J. CHELAMESWAR ALTAMAS KABIR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the disputes arising from the Joint Venture Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding related to the operation of a Luxury Tourist Train, emphasizing the enforceability of arbitration clauses under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that the termination of the lease agreement by the IRCTC was subject to arbitration, thereby upholding the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal to resolve the disputes. The ruling reinforced the principle that arbitration agreements must be honored, and parties should seek resolution through arbitration before approaching the courts.

COX & KINGS LTD. vs INDIAN RLY.CATERING & TOURSM.COR.LD.&ANR · Niyam