Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-31

JEEVAN CHANDRABHAN IDNANI vs DIVISIONAL COMMR.KONKAN BHAVAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2011/16125
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JEEVAN CHANDRABHAN IDNANI
Respondent
DIVISIONAL COMMR.KONKAN BHAVAN .
Author
CHELAMESWAR
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the second proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 31(A) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, holding that the formation of a front or aghadi by elected councillors after the election must occur within one month of the election results notification. The Court found that the impugned order allowing the formation of a 'Swatantar Aghadi' beyond this timeframe was illegal. Consequently, the dismissal of the writ petition by the Bombay High Court was upheld, affirming the strict adherence to the statutory timeline.

JEEVAN CHANDRABHAN IDNANI vs DIVISIONAL COMMR.KONKAN BHAVAN . · Niyam