Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-09

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER vs M/S ROMESH POWER PRODUCTS P.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/33800
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
Respondent
M/S ROMESH POWER PRODUCTS P.LTD.
Author
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD H.L. DATTU
Bench
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD H.L. DATTU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, the term 'person in charge of the goods' includes the owner of the goods, thus allowing for the imposition of penalties on the owner. The Court found that the High Court's ruling, which suggested that penalties could only be levied against the person in charge of the vehicle, was incorrect. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and upheld the penalty imposed by the Check-Post Authority.

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER vs M/S ROMESH POWER PRODUCTS P.LTD. · Niyam