Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-13

M/S. I.O.C.L. vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA

Citation / case number
SC 2005/13206
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. I.O.C.L.
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA
Author
A. K. PATNAIK
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE A.K. PATNAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the exemption of Reduced Crude Oil (RCO) from excise duty as per Notification No. 75/84-CE. The Court held that the exemption is contingent upon the possession of a valid registration certificate under Rule 192 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and since the Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. lacked such a certificate during the relevant period, the appellant was liable for the excise duty. The Court upheld the demands for excise duty and the rejection of refund claims, affirming the Tribunal's decision.

M/S. I.O.C.L. vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA · Niyam