Horil vs Keshav & Anr

The Supreme Court held that the suit filed by the appellant was maintainable despite the High Court's ruling under Order XXIII Rule 3-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, as it was based on allegations of fraud regarding a compromise decree. The Court emphasized that the maintainability of the suit was not barred by the provisions of the Code, as it did not involve adjudication of rights in agricultural land. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, allowing the appellant's suit to proceed.