Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-31

Jeevan Chandrabhan Idnani & Anr vs Divisional Commr.Konkan Bhavan & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 1210
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jeevan Chandrabhan Idnani & Anr
Respondent
Divisional Commr.Konkan Bhavan & Ors
Bench
J. Chelameswar, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the second proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 31(A) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, determining that the formation of a front or aghadi after municipal elections is only permissible within one month of the election results notification. The Court upheld the Bombay High Court's dismissal of a writ petition challenging the legality of an order recognizing an aghadi formed beyond this period, affirming that the High Court's interpretation of the Act was correct. The Court concluded that the impugned order was valid and did not contravene the statutory provisions.

Jeevan Chandrabhan Idnani & Anr vs Divisional Commr.Konkan Bhavan & Ors · Niyam