Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-16

Maulana Mohd.Amir Rashadi vs State Of U.P.& Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC (CRIMINAL) 469
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Maulana Mohd.Amir Rashadi
Respondent
State Of U.P.& Anr
Author
P.Sathasivam
Bench
J. Chelameswar, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision to grant bail under Sections 302 and 307 IPC was justified, emphasizing that the mere existence of criminal antecedents does not automatically disqualify an accused from bail. The Court reiterated that the role of the accused and the circumstances surrounding the case must be carefully evaluated. The appeal challenging the bail order was dismissed, affirming the High Court's conditional bail grant to the accused, Mr. Ramakant Yadav.

Maulana Mohd.Amir Rashadi vs State Of U.P.& Anr · Niyam